ADVERTISERS DROPPING DR LAURA SHOW

ADVERTISERS THAT SUPPORT CENSORSHIP OF DR LAURA

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%%--> ADVERTISERS DROPPING DR LAURA SHOW

ADVERTISERS THAT SUPPORT CENSORSHIP OF DR LAURA

Albertsons
America's Best (Eyeware)
American Express
AR Pioneer Chiropractic & Carpal Tunnel Clinic
AT&T
Bally Total Fitness
BoxLot.com
Brentwood Volvo
Brink's
CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield
CB Fleet (Summer's Eve)
Ciener-Woods Ford
Closet World
Coca-Cola
Conair
Concord Insurance
David's Bridal
Diet-ZX
Discount Dresses
EchoStar
Eckerd Corporation
Econo Lodge
Gateway Computers
GEICO
George Foreman Grill (Salton)
Hospital for Special Surgery
IHOP
Jacoby & Meyers
John Corzine for Senate (NJ)
Kaiser Permanete
Kimberly-Clark (Scott TP)
Kraft Foods
Kroger grocery chain
Les Vogel Dodge (CA)
Long John Silver's Seafood
Lowes
Luxor Resort & Hotel
Maple Leaf Foods
Mattress Discounter
Medieval Times
Mervyn's
Motel 6
Natrol (supplement company)
Oldsmobile
Ontel
Pacific Gas & Electric
PETsMART
Pfizer
Priceline.com
Proctor and Gamble
Radio Shack
Red Lobster restaurants
Renaissance Cruises
Rite-Aid
Roman Meal
Ross Stores
Rubenstein & Rynecki
Sears
Skytel (the wireless company)
Slim-Fast
Starpower Internet
Steak n Shake
Stephen's Gourmet
Stonestreet Capital
Spooky World
Sybaris
Texaco
TCF Bank
Torso Track (Suzanne Somers)
Toys-R-US
Tri-City Sporting Goods (CA)
Unilever (Brummel & Brown)
United Airlines
Verizon
Washington State Lottery
Workopolis Xerox,
Zatarain's

LETTER TO ADVERTISERS DROPPING THE DR LAURA SHOW

sample to cut and paste

(Company Name)

I would like to say that I'm very disappointed that (Company name) is involved in serving homosexual activist trying to censor Dr. Laura's free speech.

If (Company name) has a nondiscrimination policy then why is it not broad enough to include people with different opinions and viewpoints then yours?

I was wondering what your policy means by not discriminating against "sexual orientation"? Does your non-discrimination policy apply to other so-called "sexual orientations" such as: polygamy, bigamy, multiple partnership, pedophilia, voyeurism, and exhibitionism. I'm sure it does not. I'm just making a point and would like to ask why are you advocating that selected orientations be discriminated against while others are to be given protected status? Isn't such a policy inherently prejudiced?

One of the conditions of the free society is that we tolerate groups with which we disagree. Not pull support and pressure them to conform. Where is the tolerance in this?

I will make sure I never use (Company name) products and pass the word on to my friends.

Thank you